rambling on

Not a book review

Two books by Andrew Marr: A Short Book about Drawing and A Short Book about Painting

This is definitely not a book review, it’s just me getting an annoyance out of my brain that has been bugging me since I read a pair of books about art and I’m hoping that after writing it down I can forget about it.

Early last year I read A Short Book about Drawing by Andrew Marr. It’s about his experiences with drawing and about drawing as an art form, and it was quite an interesting read. Along the way, it discussed what drawing is, not just pencil and paper, but an inclusive view that includes pastels and charcoal and colour and washes and numerous other practices.

So, later in the year, I read the companion book: A Short Book about Painting. Flicking through it again, I see lots of interesting topics, but reading it left me dissatisfied. Compared to the openness and inclusivity of the first book, where anyone could draw, from rough sketches by amateurs to works by old masters, this felt somehow mean-spirited. Now that he was talking about painting, suddenly the end result had to be “good”, it had to be special and have meaning and be clever. Cliches and simple representation were definitely “not good”, no matter how technically adept they were.

And quite honestly, that annoyed the hell out of me. And, a year later, it still annoys the hell out of me. I know that a lot of people hold that view, that to qualify as art something has to be exceptional. But I was hugely disappointed to find that attitude here, especially compared to the friendly acceptance of all practices in the book about drawing. It’s that attitude that stops people from trying; the bar is set so high that it can barely be seen by someone just starting out with their first set of paints. That sneering declaration that something isn’t “good” or isn’t “art”.

I don’t know what the “right” definition of art is, never mind what constitutes “good art”. I’m sure critics and “knowledgeable people” would look at what I do and refuse to call it art.

But, if it’s not art, then what is it?

I am putting pen, pencil, ink, paint, paper or even fabric to paper and board and creating images both abstract and representational.

If that’s not art, what is?

2 thoughts on “Not a book review”

  1. Oh, that would bother me too! Art is anything you want it to be! If it is using your creative juices, then it is art! It is the artists expression of something they see or feel. There are too many judgmental people nowadays, and social media seems to have brought them out of the woodwork. Too many people feel they can say what they want through paper, pen, or social media. They often say things they would never say to your face. I avoid such posts! If you can’t say something nice, then don’t say it at all. We need to encourage each other no matter where you are on the “learning” curve. Everyone needs to remember that they started out and their work might not have been up to “their” standards. That is how people learn. Art is an expression of oneself. No one should judge your “art”. Each of us are individuals and see everything differently! Thanks for sharing this!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.